Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Korean Medical Science ; : 150-153, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-211265

ABSTRACT

Resection of retroperitoneal tumors is usually perfomed using the anterior retroperitoneal approach. Our report presents an innovative method utilizing a robotic surgical system. A 50-yr-old male patient visited our hospital due to a known paravertebral mass. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a well-encapsulated mass slightly abutting the abdominal aorta and left psoas muscle at the L4-L5 level. The tumor seemed to be originated from the prevertebral sympathetic plexus or lumbosacral trunk and contained traversing vessels around the tumor capsule. A full-time robotic transperitoneal tumor resection was performed. Three trocars were used for the robotic camera and working arms. The da Vinci Surgical System(R) provided delicate dissection in the small space and the tumor was completely removed without damage to the surrounding organs and great vessels. This case demonstrates the feasibility of robotic resection in retroperitoneal space. Robotic surgery offered less invasiveness in contrast to conventional open surgery.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aorta, Abdominal , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neurilemmoma/diagnosis , Retroperitoneal Space , Robotics/instrumentation , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
2.
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society ; : 248-251, 2011.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-173919

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In the field of spinal surgery, a few laboratory results or clinical cases about robotic spinal surgery have been reported. In vivo trials and development of related surgical instruments for spinal surgery are required before its clinical application. We investigated the use of the da Vinci(R) Surgical System in spinal surgery at the craniovertebral junction in a human cadaver to demonstrate the efficacy and pitfalls of robotic surgery. METHODS: Dissection of pharyngeal wall to the exposure of C1 and odontoid process was performed with full robotic procedure. Although assistance of another surgeon was necessary for drilling and removal of odontoid process due to the lack of appropriate end-effectors, successful robotic procedures for dural sutures and exposing spinal cord proved its safety and dexterity. RESULTS: Robot-assisted odontoidectomy was successfully performed in a human cadaver using the da Vinci(R) Surgical System with few robotic arm collisions and minimal soft tissue damages. Da Vinci(R) Surgical System manifested more dexterous movement than human hands in the deep and narrow oral cavity. Furthermore, sutures with robotic procedure in the oral cavity demonstrated the advantage over conventional procedure. CONCLUSION: Presenting cadaveric study proved the probability of robot-assisted transoral approach. However, the development of robotic instruments specific to spinal surgery must first precede its clinical application.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arm , Cadaver , Hand , Imidazoles , Mandrillus , Mouth , Nitro Compounds , Odontoid Process , Robotics , Spinal Cord , Surgical Instruments , Sutures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL